Irc Sp 63 2004 Pdf Free Download 4,1/5 7881votes In order to promote public education and public safety, equal justice for all, a better informed citizenry, the rule of law, world trade and world peace, this legal document is hereby made available on a noncommercial basis, as it is the right of all humans to know and speak the laws that govern them. (For more information: ) Name of Standards Organization: Indian Roads Congress (IRC) Designator of Legally Binding Document: IRC SP 084 Title of Legally Binding Document: Manual for Specifications and Standards for Four Laning of Highways Through Public Private Partnership (First Revision) LEGALLY BINDING DOCUMENT Step Out From the Old to the New-Jawaharlal Nehru Invent a new India using knowledge.-Satyanarayan Gangaram Pitroda. Carol Burnett Show Collection Torrent.
IRC SP 063: Guidelines for the Use of Interlocking Concrete Block Pavement. By Indian Roads Congress. Publication date. Name of Standards Organization: Indian Roads Congress (IRC) Designator of Legally Binding Document: IRC SP. Satyanarayan Gangaram Pitroda. Identifier govlawircy2004sp63.
Download as DOCX, PDF. Flag for inappropriate content. IRC SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS. IRC:SP:63-2004 Guidelines for the Use of Interlocking Concrete Block Pavement 55. Post navigation.
In order to promote public education and public safety, equal justice for all, a better informed citizenry, the rule of law, world trade and world peace, this legal document is hereby made available on a noncommercial basis, as it is the right of all humans to know and speak the laws that govern them. (For more information: ) Name of Standards Organization: Indian Roads Congress (IRC) Designator of Legally Binding Document: IRC SP 013 Title of Legally Binding Document: Guidelines for the Design of Small Bridges and Culverts LEGALLY BINDING DOCUMENT Step Out From the Old to the New-Jawaharlal Nehru Invent a new India using knowledge.-Satyanarayan Gangaram Pitroda.
Full text of ' GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF INTERLOCKING CONCRETE BLOCK PAVEMENT THE INDIAN ROADS CONGRESS 2004 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2014 IRC:SP:63-2004 GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF INTERLOCKING CONCRETE BLOCK PAVEMENT Published by THE INDIAN ROADS CONGRESS Jamnagar House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi- noon 2004 Price Rs. 200/- (Plus packing and postage) IRC:SP:63-2004 First Published Reprinted Reprinted Reprinted October, 2004 July, 2006 July, 2008 October, 2010 (The Rights of Publication and Translation are Reserved) Printed at: India Offset Press, A-1, Mayapuri Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi- 1 10064 (500 copies) IRC:SP:63-2004 GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF INTERLOCKING CONCRETE BLOCK PAVEMENT CONTENTS Personnel of the Highways Specifications and Standards Committee. (i) & (iii) Background. Types and Shapes of Blocks. Composition of Block Pavement. Structural Design of Concrete Block Pavement. ' 33 Annexure.
35 IRC:SP:63-2004 PERSONNEL OF THE HIGHWAYS SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS COMMITTEE (As on 22.5.2004) Director General (Road Development) & Spl. Network marketing tips in hindi pdf. Secretary to the Govt, of India, Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, Transport Bhavan, New Delhi- 1 1 000 1 Chief Engineer (R&B) S&R, Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, Transport Bhavan, New Delhi- 1 10001 1. Indu Prakash. (Convenor) 2. Sharan (Co-Convenor) 3.
The Chief Engineer (R&B) S&R (Member-Secretary) 4. Chakrabarty 6. D.P.Gupta 10. S.K.Gupta 11.
Prabha Kant Katare 15. Sharan) Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, Transport Bhavan, New Delhi-1 10001 Member, Chief Engineer, Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, Transport Bhavan, New Delhi- 1 1 000 1 Chief General Manager (NS), National Highways Authority of India, Plot No. G/5-6, Sector 10, Dwarka, New Delhi-1 10045 ^Executive Director, Consulting Engg.
Services (I) Pvt. Ltd., 57, Nehru Place, New Delhi- 1 1 00 1 9 Sr.
Vice-President (Tech. Ser.), Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd., Ambuja House, Ishwarbhuwan Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad-380009 Professor, Transportation System, Civil Engg.
Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai, Powai, Mumbai-400076 DG(RD) (Retd.), E-44, Greater Kailash (Part I) Enclave, New Delhi-1 10048 Chief Engineer, PWD, Almora Chief Engineer (Retd.), House No. 452, Sector 14, Sonepat-13 1001 Professor & Coordinator (COTE), Deptt. Of Civil Engg., Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, Roorkee-247667 Chief Executive, L.R. Kadiyali & Associates, X-15 (First Floor), Hauz Khas, New Delhi-1 10016 Joint Director (PI), National Rural Road Dev.
Of Rural Dev.) NBCC Tower, 5th Floor, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-1 10066 Chief Engineer (Retd.), H. 77, 1st Floor, Sector 15A, Distt. Gautam Budh Nagar, Noida-201301. ADG(R) being not in position, the meeting was presided by Shri Indu Prakasli, DG(RD) & Spl. Secretary to the Govt, of India, MORT&H (i) IRC:SP:63-2004 16. Gopal Ranjan 20.
Arghya Pradip Saha 22. C.K.Singh 25. Nirmal Jit Singh 26. Velayudhan 31. The Chief Engineer (NH) Chief Engineer-cum-Addl.
Irc Sp 63-2004
Secy, to the Govt, of Rajasthan, P.W.D., Jacob Road, Jaipur-302006 Secretary (Works), Maharashtra P.W.D., Mantralaya, Mumbai-400032 Secretary (Works) (Retd.), C-58, Abhimanshree Housing Society, Off Pashan Road, Pune-41 1008 Director, College of Engg.Roorkee, Post Box No. Roorkee-Hardwar Road, Vardhman Puram, Roorkee-247667 Secretary to the Govt, of Gujarat, R&B Department, Block No.
14/1, Sardar Bhavan, Sachivalaya, Gandhinagar-382010 Sr. Consultant, M-504, Habitat (Highway) CGHS, B-19, Vasundhra Enclave, Delhi DG(RD) & AS, MORT&H (Retd.), 175, Vigyapan Lok, 15, Mayur Vihar Phase-I Extn.
(Near Samachar Apartments), Delhi- 110091 Director, Central Road Research Institute, P.O. CRRI, Delhi- Mathura Road, New Delhi- 1 1 0020 Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Addl. (Retd.), House ISfo. M-10 (D.S.) Hermu Housing Colony, Main Hermu Road, Ranchi (Jharkhand) Member (Tech.), National Highways Authority of India, Plot No.
G/5-6, Sector 10, Dwarka, New Delhi-1 10045 Chief General Manager, National Highways Authority of India, Plot No. G/5-6, Sector 10 Dwarka, New Delhi-1 10045 DG(RD & SS, MORT&H (Retd.), G-1365, Ground Floor, Chittranjan Park, New Delhi-1 10019 Chief Engineer, Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, Transport Bhavan, New Delhi-1 10001 DG(RD) & AS, MOST (Retd.), S-108, Panchshila Park, New Delhi-1 10017 Addl. D.G.B.R., Directorate General Border Roads, Seema Sadak Bhavan, Ring Road, Delhi Cantt., New Delhi-1 10010 Executive Director-Marketing, Oriental Structural Engrs. Ltd., 21, Commercial Complex, Malcha Marg, Diplomatic End., New Delhi-1 10021 (B.
Prabhakar Rao), R&B Department, Errum Manzil, Hyderabad-500082 (ii) IRC:SP:63-2004 33. The Chief Engineer (Pig.) 34. The Chief Eilgineer (Mech.) 35. The Chief Engineer (Mech.) 36. The Chief Engineer (NH) 37. The Engineer-in-Chief 38. The Chief Engineer 39.
President, Indian Road Congress 40. The Director General (Road Development) & Special Secretary 41. Secretary, Indian Roads Congress 1. Basu), Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, Transport Bhavan, New Delhi- 11 0001 (V.K.
Sachdev), Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, Transport Bhavan, New Delhi- 1 10001 PWD, G Block, 4th Floor, Writers' Building, Kolkata-700001 (Ratnakar Dash), Sachivalaya Marg, Unit IV, Bhubaneswar- 751001 Distt. Khurdha (Orissa) U.P. P.W.D., 96, M.G. Road, Lucknow-226001 National Highways, PWD Annexe, K.R. Circle, Bangalore-560001 Ex-Officio Members (S.S. Momin), Secretary (Works), PWD Sachivalaya, Mumbai-400032 (Indu Prakash), Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, Transport Bhavan, New Delhi-110001 (R.S. Sharma), Indian Roads Congress, Jamnagar House, New Delhi- noon Corresponding Members Engineer-in-Chief, Haryana PWD (Retd.) House No.
40, Sector 16, Panchkula-134113 Emeritus Fellow, 334, 25th Cross, 14th Main, Banashankari, 2nd Stage, Bangalore-560070 Executive Director, Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd., Hincon House, Lai Bahadur Shastri Marg. Vikhroli (W), Mumbai-400083 Director (Project), Bhagheeratha Engg. Ltd., 132, Panampily Avenue, Cochin-682036 Principal Secretary, Maharashtra PWD (Retd.), A-47/1344, Adarsh Nagar, WorU, Mumbai-400025 (iii) IRC:SP:63-2004 GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF INTERLOCKING CONCRETE BLOCK PAVEMENTS Background The Rigid Pavement Committee (H-5) in its meeting held on the 28th November, 2003 discussed the draft Guidehnes for the Use of Interlocking Concrete Block Pavements and desired to recirculate the modified document in light of the suggestions made by the members to improve the document. Accordingly, the modified document was circulated and discussed during the meeting of H-5 Committee (Personnel given below) held on the 8th March, 2004 and the document was approved with certain modifications: Rigid Pavement Committee (H-5) Dr. Kadiyali Convenor The CE (R&B) S&R, MORT&H (G.
Sharan) Co-Convenor M.C. Venkatesha Member-Secretary Members H.S. Chahal M.L.N. Sabnis President, IRC (S.S. Sharma Brajendra Singh V.K.
Of MSRDC (P.D. Kulkami) A Rep. Of DGBR (M.S. Sodhi) A Rep.
Malayalam cartoons free download. Of NCC&BM (R.C. Wason) A Rep. Of CRRI (Satandar Kumar) Director, HRS (K. Thangarasu) Ex-Officio Members DG(RD) & SS (Indu Prakash) Secretary, IRC (R.S. Sharma) Corresponding Members K.B. Krishna Rao A.U. Ravi Shankar Dr.
(Mrs.) Vandana Tare 1 IRC:SP:63-2004 The draft was discussed by the Highways Specifications and Standards Committee during its meeting held on the 22nd May, 2004 and the draft was approved subject to modifications in light of the comments made by its members. The modified document as received from the Convenor, H-5 Committee was placed before the Executive Conmiittee in its meeting held on 25th May, 2004. The Executive Committee considered the Guidelines for being placed before the Council. The Council in its 172nd Meeting held at Nainital (Uttaranchal) on the 12th June, 2004 approved the document for publication subject to modification in light of the comments/suggestions given by the participants. The document has been modified suitably by Dr. Kadiyali, Convenor, H-5 Committee.
SCOPE Interlocking Concrete Block Pavements have been extensively used in a number of countries for quite sometime. Considering their advantages and potential for use, the guidelines have been prepared for the design and construction of such pavements, giving the suggested applications, design catalogues, construction practices and specifications for their use. APPLICATIONS 2.1. Interlocking Concrete Block Pavements have been found to have applications in several situations. Footpaths and Side-walks 2.
Cycle Tracks 3. Residential streets 4.
Fuel Stations 6. Rural Roads through villages 7. Highway Rest Areas 8. Toll Plaza 9.
Bus Depots 10. Approaches to Railway Level Crossings 11. Intersections 12.
City Streets 13. Truck Parking Areas 14. Industrial floors 15. Urban Sections of Highways 16. Road Repairs during Monsoon 17.
Container Depots 18. Port Wharf and Roads 19. Roads in high altitude areas 2 IRC:SP:63-2004 2.2. Advantages and Limitations of Interlocking Concrete Block Pavements. Advantages (i) Since the blocks are prepared in the factory, they are of a very high quality, thus avoiding the difficulties encountered in quality control in the field. (ii) Concrete block pavements restrict the speed of vehicles to about 60 km per hour, which is an advantage in city streets and intersections.
(iii) Because of the rough surface, these pavements are skid-resistant. (iv) The block pavements are ideal for intersections where speeds have to be restricted and cornering stresses are high.
(v) The digging and reinstatement of trenches for repairs to utilities is easier in the case of block pavement. (vi) These pavements are unaffected by the spillage of oil from vehicles, and are ideal for bus stops, bus depots and parking areas. (vii) They are preferred in heavily loaded areas like container depots and ports as they can be very well designed to withstand the high stresses induced there. (viii) In India, the laying of concrete block pavements can be achieved at a low cost because of the availability of cheap labour.
(ix) Since the concrete blocks are grey in colour, they reflect light better then the black bituminous pavements, thus bringing down the cost of street lighting. (x) The cost of maintenance is much lower than a bituminous surface. (xi) Block pavement does not need in-situ curing and so can be opened to traffic soon after completion of construction. (xii) Construction of block pavement is simple and labour-intensive, and can be done using simple compaction equipment. (xiii) Maintenance of block pavement is simple and easy. Also, the need for frequency of maintenance is low as compared to bituminous pavement.
(xiv) Structurally round blocks can be recycled many times over. (xv) Unlike concrete pavements, block pavement does not exhibit very deterioratory effect due to thermal expansion and contraction, and are free from the cracking phenomenon. (xvi) Use of permeable block pavement in cities and towns can help replenish depleting underground sources of water, filter pollutants before they reach open water sources, help reduce storm water runoff and decrease the quantum of drainage structures. Limitations (i) Concrete block pavements cannot be used for high speed facilities. (ii) The riding quality is reasonably good for low-speed traffic, but is inferior to that observed on a machine laid bituminous or concrete pavement. IRC:SP:63-2004 (iii) The noise generated is high, 5-8 dB (A) higher than bituminous surfaces. — (iv) A very good attention to pavement drainage is needed because the water can seep through the joints.
TYPES AND SHAPES OF BLOCKS The blocks can be interlocking horizontally and vertically, as shown in Fig 1. Present day interlocking blocks have evolved in shape after observing their performance. The three phases in the evolution of the shape of the blocks are shown in Fig. The rectangular shape shown in Fig.
2(i) is the shape which was intended for imitating the stone set blocks. The shape shown in Fig.
2(ii) is an improved version with many dentated faces for better contact between adjoining blocks thus enhancing the interlocking effect and friction between them. This helps in increasing the shear strength of the block system and thus the load dispersal capacity. The block shown in Fig. 2(iii) is a further improvement over dentated rectangular block. The block shown in Fig. 2(iv) gives still better interlock and is suitable for fully mechanized paving. The dentated blocks further can be grouped as shown in Fig.
3 into three categories as under: Category A: Dentated units are designed to key into each other on all four faces and which, by their plan geometry when keyed together, resist the widening of the joint. These blocks are generally capable of being laid in herringbone bond pattern (as explained in Section 8). Category B: These blocks are dentated on only two sides. Their dimensional accuracy of laying: helps in bringing about the interlock effect on other faces. Generally, with some exceptions, these blocks can only be laid in stretcher bond, as explained in Section 8. Category C: These are not dentated type but depend on dimensional accuracy for interlocking effect.
These blocks can be laid only in a stretcher bond.#■'» 4 In addition to regular blocks described above, supplementary blocks of half size would be required for paving purpose. In the case of rectangular blocks, more number of half blocks would be generally required than other category of blocks. 4 IRC:SP:63-2004 (i) SOME TYPICAL SHAPES OF INTERLOCKING BLOCKS (ii) SOME TYPICAL SHAPES OF VERTICALLY INTERLOCKING BLOCKS Fig. Some shapes of interlocking blocks 5. (i) INITIAL COST AND SIZE SIMILAR TO PAVING BRICK (ii) DENTATED TO PROVIDE KEY WITH ADJOINING UNITS, RETAINING ESSENTIALLY BRICK DIMENSIONS (ill) NEW SHAPE FOR BETTER PERFORMANCE UNDER TRAFFIC AND PERMITTING MECHANICAL LAYING OF BLOCKS (iv) 'X' SHAPED BLOCK FOR BETTER INTERLOCK AND FASTER MECHANISED PAVING Fig. Basic shapes of blocks IRC:SP:63-2004 CATEGORY A A (1) B (1) c (i; D (1) E (1) F (i; CATEGORY G (2) H (2) (2) J (2) K (2) L (2) X X cn cca ^ M (2) N (2) 0 (2) P (2) Q (2) R (2) □ CATEGORY C S (2) T (2) U (2) V (2) NOTES (1) SUITABLE FOR A VARIETY OF (2) SUITABLE ONLY BONDS INCLUDING HERRINGBONE FOR STRETCHER BOND BLOCKS KNOWN TO HAVE HAD LOAD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES OR TRAFFIC TESTS Fig.
Different catagories of blocks Special Grass Blocks For improving aesthetic looks of paved areas, architects have been making use of block pavement extensively. The numerous paving blocks and their joints mellow down the harshness created by large transverse joints formed in conventional concrete pavement.
For improving aesthetics further, grass blocks have been developed. These when constructed in a grid formation allow space in the pavement for growing grass as shown in Fig. These are best suited for walkways, driveways, etc. Coloured blocks also add to the aesthetic beauty. COMPOSITION OF BLOCK PAVEMENT 4.1. General Except for the top wearing part of the pavement, the base and sub-base layers are similar to the conventional flexible or rigid pavement.
Depending upon the load coming on them, the composition of the pavement differs. Typical Pavement Composition A few typical compositions normally used are given in Figs. Block Thickness Interlocking concrete blocks come in different thicknesses. These blocks serve as wearing surface but at the same time help in reducing the stresses imposed on subgrade and also help in resisting pavement deformation and elastic deflections similar to the base course of a flexible pavement. 7 IRC:SP:63-2004 SUBGRADE SOIL Fig.
Grass blocks and the construction technique IRC:SP:63-2004 '.
IRC Guidelines for Pavement and Materials S.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |